| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
21. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Orca Platypus wrote: How surprising, another gewn buff. 20 Nyxgewnbots ratting in a cynojammed pocket in now officially a thing. I thought CCP will never go through with the gewn proposal of more anoms, I believed that much favor was ridiculo...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:02:59
|
22. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Sgt Ocker wrote: So all those soon to be ok systems in Branch (that might see 1 person active in them a day) are still off the table without a blue tick next to your name.. Shame - that space could be put to good use by smaller groups. i mea...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:01:29
|
23. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
davet517 wrote: Stop making null-sec richer and safer, ffs. It's already too rich, and it's already too safe. highsec incursions
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 13:00:35
|
24. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
boy howdy the first thing i think of when approaching the problem of eve retention rate is making more mining activities
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 03:14:03
|
25. Sticky:Dev blog: Summer of Sov - Nullsec PVE and Upgrades - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Ms Michigan wrote: MINING activity Ms Michigan wrote: get those subscriber numbers back up ummmmmmmm
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.07.09 03:02:56
|
26. Petition of no confidence against corbexx of CSM10 - in Wormholes [original thread]
all part of the master plan to get wormholes nerfed into irrelevance
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.22 22:00:53
|
27. Announcement:[Feedback Wanted] Time Zone Mechanics Survey - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
in retrospect adding the "are you currently a sov haver" question makes it p easy for y'all to discard the responses that answer "currently yes" after all "entosis" is a term used to talk about fighting cancer, makes you think
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.17 20:19:53
|
28. Announcement:[Feedback Wanted] Time Zone Mechanics Survey - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Terra Chrall wrote: Sven Viko VIkolander wrote: xttz wrote: Fozzie, what do you think about scaling vulnerability windows linked to how the space is used? Barely used territory would be very easy to take, actively used systems would be ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.13 19:35:06
|
29. Announcement:[Feedback Wanted] Time Zone Mechanics Survey - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Eli Apol wrote: Primetime should scale with how large the alliance holding it is: Large alliances have more people covering more TZs = easier to cover longer primetimes
Large alliances hav...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.13 17:19:38
|
30. Announcement:[Feedback Wanted] Time Zone Mechanics Survey - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Eli Apol wrote: Primetime should scale with how large the alliance holding it is: Large alliances have more people covering more TZs = easier to cover longer primetimes
Large alliances have more PvErs available to raise the indices (i.e...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.13 17:05:12
|
31. Fozzie Sov is the Wrong Sov: An alternate vision - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Iain Cariaba wrote: Tykonderoga wrote: Says the people who don't fly them or understand them but merely prattle out of ignorance and jealousy. The biggest problem with supers is that they provide people a undeserved feeling of elite superi...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 19:11:54
|
32. Fozzie Sov is the Wrong Sov: An alternate vision - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
lmbo
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 16:59:17
|
33. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Veskrashen wrote: CCP Fozzie wrote: Soldarius wrote: Now this begs another question: If I am in the process of capturing a sov structure I lose lock and then reestablish lock before the module cycle time is completed, will capture recomme...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 13:16:09
|
34. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Lena Lazair wrote: Not only is this important, it's fundamental. However, the idea that ANY large bloc would be able to refrain from attacking each other once trollsov goes live is simply laughable. The decision will no longer be in the hands ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 13:05:17
|
35. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kristian Hackett wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Kristian Hackett wrote: The amount of laughs I'm getting from the "wah no interceptors" crowd is amazing. There's a bajillion ways to deal with interceptors, be it a single one or a full f...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 03:57:03
|
36. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Kristian Hackett wrote: The amount of laughs I'm getting from the "wah no interceptors" crowd is amazing. There's a bajillion ways to deal with interceptors, be it a single one or a full fleet of them. Needless to say, for those of your worried...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 03:19:52
|
37. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
bobjoe9 wrote: If alliances are holding to much sov(they are for renting reasons) why not just ban renting sov in the EULA/TOS. No reason to hold 80+ systems anymore instead of making alliances defend sov for 4 hours a day when most people only...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 03:03:18
|
38. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
http://i.imgur.com/2Q5eKBf.jpg
no stop it what are you doing PLEASE NO DON'T DO THIS AAAAAAA
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 02:59:13
|
39. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Basil Pupkin wrote: For this reason this system needs to be rethinked from the ground up, without participation of CCPeople who are know as goon lap dogs. under no circumstances should you ever drink bleach please do not stand up from your ...
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 02:56:37
|
40. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Basil Pupkin wrote: Seriously, this system is so severely biased for goons I wonder who actually came up with it. agreed, for this reason we need to ensure interceptors cannot use entosis links
- by Promiscuous Female - at 2015.03.12 01:05:16
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |